Archive for June, 2009

Mortgage Insurer PMI Broadening Loan-Modification Effort

avoiding-pmi-private-mortgage-insurancePMI Mortgage Insurance Co. (PMI) is expanding its loan-modification efforts to include all mortgages insured by it, not just Home Affordable Refinance Program-eligible loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae (FNM) or Freddie Mac (FRE).

Mortgage insurers, who cover loans with an outstanding balance of at least 80% of the home’s value or purchase price, have been hurt by skyrocketing claims as defaults continue to mount. As such, it is to their benefit that loans don’t go bad.


PMI’s role in loan-modification efforts entails insurance certificates, and the company said it won’t charge fees to modify the existing ones. To be eligible, the loans in question must be current and the changes should ease payment terms, extend the period in which adjustable rates are fixed or lengthen the payoff timeframe.

PMI shares were recently down 2% at $1.90. The stock is down 39% the past year, but sharply higher than its all-time low of 26 cents hit in March.

JPMorgan modifies mortgages under government program

jpmorgan_chaseNEW YORK (Reuters) – JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) has approved 138,000 trial mortgage modifications since early April, when it started modifying certain loans under a U.S. government program, the bank said on Tuesday.

Chase, JPMorgan’s consumer and commercial bank, said it has helped prevent 565,000 foreclosures since 2007 through its own modification program and the government plan.

The bank, which generally halts foreclosure while assessing a mortgage for modification, said it is reviewing a further 155,000 applications for modifications.

Banks have been battling rising loan losses from mortgages as the financial crisis has spiraled and the U.S. unemployment rate has reached 9.4 percent.

The pace of home loan modifications climbed by 55 percent in the first quarter from the 2008 fourth quarter, but mortgage payment delinquencies and foreclosures are also rising, U.S. bank regulators said in a report on Tuesday.

(Reporting by Elinor Comlay; editing by John Wallace)

Loan Modifications Up During First Quarter

6Lenders modified more troubled loans during the first quarter, according to a government report released today, but a growing number of borrowers are falling behind on their payments.

The report by the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision, which regulate banks and thrifts, found that the number of loan modifications during the first quarter jumped 55 percent from the previous quarter and 172 percent from the first quarter of 2008. The report tracks data on 64 percent of outstanding first lien residential mortgages.


More troubled borrowers are seeing their payments reduced as part of a loan modification, including by having their interest rate lowered or the terms of their loan extended. But it still remains rare for the lender to cut the principal owed by the homeowner, despite a continuing tumble in home prices. During the first quarter, only 1.8 percent of loan modifications included a reduction of principal, according to the report.

“While I’m very concerned about the rise in delinquent mortgages and foreclosure actions, the shift in emphasis by servicers to more sustainable, payment-reducing modifications is a positive step that should show significant benefits in the coming months,” Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan said in a statement.

But even as the rate of loan modifications grow, the number of borrowers seriously delinquent or who have missed at least two payments is growing, too. And borrowers continue to default at a high rate even after a modification.

The statistics also underline a shift in the housing crisis from simply a problem with subprime or other types of risky loans. Prime borrowers, who are traditionally considered safer, are falling behind on their payments faster as unemployment rises and home values drop.

The percentage of prime borrowers seriously delinquent on their mortgage rose 20.3 percent during the first quarter compared with the previous quarter. It was up 163.7 percent compared with the same quarter a year ago. In comparison, the percentage of subprime borrowers seriously delinquent rose only 1.5 percent during the first quarter. It was up 54.9 percent from the same period a year ago.

The numbers do not reflect any impact of the Obama administration’s foreclosure prevention program, which lenders began implementing in March. But J.P. Morgan Chase announced today that it had approved 87,100 modifications under the federal program since April. Another 50,900 modifications have been approved for borrowers who did not qualify for that program.

“It has taken some time to put the resources in place to handle the extraordinary customer demand during this crisis, to incorporate each update to the [administration's] Making Home Affordable Program, and then to properly evaluate each borrower’s situation,” Charlie Scharf, head of retail financial services at J.P. Morgan Chase, said in a statement. “Over the last three months, we have made great improvements and we expect the numbers of approved modifications to continue to grow for some time.”


Obama’s Housing Fix Falls Flat

44140130_13606705001_0218dv-pol-obama-housing-SJ-plus
Data released from the Mortgage Bankers Association shows the Obama “mortgage-rescue plan” has been a total failure. While the Obama regime boldly predicted that “4 to 5 million”Americans would he helped by the plan in the first year, after three months only 13,000 mortgage-refinancings have been executed by U.S. banksters as part of this program. This works out to only about 50,000 when projected over a full year, or about 1% of Obama’s absurd prediction.

As I pointed out more than two months ago (see “Obama’s mortgage-rescue plan: give banks money”), there was never any possibility that this sham/band-aid would accomplish anything. The plan called for the Obama regime to give banks “incentives” – with absolutely no strings attached.

The cooperation of the banks was totally voluntarily. Even worse, there is no oversight or auditing of this program. This means that U.S. banks are free to pretend they are helping millions of Americans, pocket the “incentives” (i.e. hand-outs), and walk away.

The MBA has now revised downward its estimate of the total dollar value of refinancings for this year by 30% – from an estimate made only three months earlier. Expect the real numbers to end up being much worse still.

Even the propagandists at CNN have been forced to acknowledge that yet another “housing fix” is turning out to be nothing but more empty promises. However, this didn’t stop CNN from mounting an absurd defense of this failure: the reason why the program has been such a dismal disappointment was because too many people applied for refinancings.

Naturally, this nonsense does not hold up to scrutiny. Further on in the CNN article, it was stated that with the banksters “flooded with requests”, they would handle “the easiest ones first.” Of course, if they really were “flooded with requests” and were handling them as efficiently as possible, then we should have expected a large number of “mortgage rescues” rather than virtually none.

CNN went on to “predict” that if the volume of total applications dropped that the number of “mortgage rescues” under the Obama plan would rise. In reality, data over the last month has shown the volume of mortgage applications has collapsed, with the biggest drop occurring in refinancing applications. In other words, this nonsense has already proved to be false.

As I have been writing for nearly a year, there is an obvious conclusion to be drawn from the fact that two, successive U.S. governments have done nothing more to fix the U.S. housing collapse other than make one empty promise after another. The U.S. government does not want to keep Americans in their homes, it wants to push them out. In a previous commentary (“U.S. government paying homeowners to walk away”), I pointed out how the U.S. government has been quietly slipping financially-devastated Americans a cheque for $1000 – to get them to vacate their homes.


Of course, neither the Obama regime nor the U.S. propaganda-machine want to publicize this government program, so there have been no aggregate figures released. However, obviously the total number of Americans pushed out of their homes over the last three months would have exceeded the pitiful total of those who were (temporarily) “rescued”.

The natural question to ask is: why would the U.S. government want Americans to lose their homes? The answer to that question comes in two parts. First of all, echoing a recent quote from Senator Richard Durbin (“U.S. Senator: Banksters “own” Congress”), the U.S. financial crime syndicate “owns” the U.S. government – having paid for it in “installments” (i.e. campaign contributions) over the last twenty years. (Indeed, no one in the U.S. government was raking in contributions from U.S. banksters faster than Obama, himself.)

This is hardly a secret. With more than 90% of all bail-out dollars going straight into the vaults of U.S. banks, U.S. politicians have left no doubt about whom they are working for.

Secondly, why would the banksters want Americans thrown out of their homes? Simple. To start with, U.S. banks have been explicitly permitted to hide their trillions in losses, through fraudulent accounting (see “FASB strong-armed into mark-to-fantasy accounting”). Furthermore, they have already proven they can order (and, if necessary, extort) all the trillions of dollars they need in hand-outs to ensure their own survival.

Thus, ultimately, the banksters will be scooping up trillions of dollars of U.S. real estate through foreclosures (i.e. for free), and when U.S. real estate values eventually begin to re-inflate some time around the middle of next decade, they will make fabulous gains on this real estate. For those who are skeptical that the U.S. financial crime syndicate engages in such long-term planning, simply read “The Bankers Manifesto of 1892” – where they described their plans, in detail.

Meanwhile, the job assigned to the lackeys in the U.S. government and the U.S. media are to lie and stall. The corporate propaganda-machine is doing its part (see “Bloomberg’s Sunday propaganda: U.S. housing has bottomed”). The talking-heads in the media generally proclaim a “bottom” in the U.S. housing market about once a month – at the least.

The actual “plan” to fix the U.S. housing market is very straightforward: demolish millions of excess homes to reduce inventories to a level where demand can eventually meet supply (see “U.S. banks bulldozing NEW homes”). When you are getting trillions of dollars in real estate for free, you can afford to destroy a couple of million homes.

Expect the puppets of the Obama regime to stall for a few more weeks, claiming that “the plan needs time to work”. By sometime this summer (after another million Americans have been thrown out into the streets), yet another “housing fix” will be announced (with a huge fanfare from media propagandists). This will be yet more empty promises, and this “circus” will continue.


Banks want Americans to lose their homes. They even explicitly promised this more than a century ago. And unlike most of what you read from the media today, that was a promise which you can actually believe.

Foreclosures grind on as lenders fail to modify loans

mort_gagex
The Obama administration’s $75 billion program to reduce foreclosures has been beset by backlogs and delays, leading many overstretched homeowners to complain about unreturned phone calls and inaccurate information from lenders, while others say they were denied help for reasons that weren’t clear.
Details of the plan were unveiled in early March. The goal is to prevent up to 4 million foreclosures by having banks modify loans into more affordable monthly payments.

Since its debut, the plan has led to offers of more than 190,000 mortgage modifications with lower monthly payments, according to the Treasury Department. During that time, lenders either have started or advanced foreclosure proceedings against more than 1 million homes, according to RealtyTrac. About 20% of those were foreclosed upon and repossessed. The Center for Responsible Lending says 2.4 million Americans are at risk of foreclosure in 2009, and 8.1 million could be over the next four years.

Homeowners who apply for mortgage modifications are finding that banks typically are taking 45 to 60 days to respond to inquiries, according to a report this month by NeighborWorks America, a provider of foreclosure-prevention counseling.


Some homeowners who applied for mortgage modifications five months ago still have no answer on whether they will be able to arrange smaller monthly payments, leaving them uncertain whether they’ll keep their homes or lose them shortly.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: Barack Obama | Bank of America | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Coldwell Banker | Countrywide Financial | Realogy
“Some lenders may not be turning (homeowners) down right away because it might be politically easier to push them off and delay,” says Joel Naroff at Naroff Economic Advisors. “No one will admit they’re doing this.”

Naroff also says banks today are dealing with even more demand for mortgages, including refinancings, than during the peak of the housing bubble in 2006, and the backlog is likely to get worse as more homeowners lose their jobs. Mortgage delinquencies have been growing in areas where unemployment has been rising fast, and even homeowners who successfully get modified mortgages could face trouble later if their incomes or home values fall.

Lenders say they’re doing the best they can with a tsunami of requests, but some industry officials say delays are hampering efforts to revive the housing market.

“The loan-modification program is suffering. What we’re doing right now isn’t working as expected,” says Richard A. Smith, CEO of Realogy, the parent company of Century 21, Coldwell Banker, Sotheby’s International Realty and ERA. “The delays are horrible. Banks, unfortunately, just weren’t geared up for this.”

This month, Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., and 14 other senators wrote a letter to Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Shaun Donovan and called for a new strategy to get lenders to respond to homeowners faster.

“Of particular concern are homeowners who have been instructed by HUD-approved counselors to contact their (loan) servicers only to be rebuffed or, worse, never even reach their servicer,” it said.

Robin and Craig Doyle of Woodland Hills, Calif., have been trying to get a loan modification through their lender, JPMorgan Chase, since February.

Robin, who does freelance writing from home, said she initially was told to send a letter describing her hardship, paycheck stubs, tax returns and other information.

She assembled a 200-page file and sent it along. A month later, she was told she had to redo the information because the file she’d sent had become outdated.

Another time, Robin says, she was told her file had been mistakenly closed altogether. On another occasion, she was told the request couldn’t be processed because she hadn’t included information about a homeowner association fee, even though her family doesn’t belong to such an association.

“I’ve had to resend it four times,” says Robin, 35. “It’s making me sick. It’s been five months. I’ve spent hours and hours on this and sleepless nights. It’s foremost on my mind. I look at my beautiful home and wonder if I’ll have it next month.”

The Doyles pay $5,031 a month on a mortgage of $947,000. They have an interest-only loan at a 6.3% rate that will reset in about seven years. On interest-only loans, borrowers pay only interest for a specific period to temporarily reduce the payments. After that, they pay interest and principal.

Craig, a writer in the television and movie industry, is still finding work but not as much as before. This is the first month the family has failed to make its mortgage payment.

“I feel like Obama’s plan has done absolutely nothing,” says Craig, 38.

Jennifer Zuccarelli, a Chase spokeswoman, says there were miscommunications in the Doyles’ case, and the bank is working to resolve the situation. It also has added about 950 loan counselors the past six months.

“We’re hiring hundreds more every month,” Zuccarelli says.

After USA TODAY contacted Chase for comment, the Doyles say the bank told them the next week to resubmit their application. They later were told they don’t qualify for the Obama plan because their loan amount is too high.

Bonuses for mortgage collectors

Other major lenders say they are beefing up staffing to process modification requests. Some say it has taken time because details of the Obama administration’s plan weren’t outlined until March.

Under the plan, if the borrower’s monthly payment is reduced by 6% or more but not below a 31% mortgage-debt-to-income ratio, the servicer can receive success payments of up to $1,000 for three years, provided the borrower stays current.

Once a three-month trial period is complete and loan documents are signed, the servicer is entitled to a one-time $1,000 incentive payment and the investor receives a $1,500 check.

The investor incentive is important because the program is targeted mainly at hard-to-modify loans in certain mortgage-backed securities.

Loan modifications can help borrowers by reducing mortgage principal, the interest rate or the term of the loan. The government also has set aside money to help up to 5 million families refinance into safer long-term mortgages from risky kinds of adjustable mortgages whose payments could soar to unaffordable levels.

Those who don’t qualify for either refinancing help or loan modifications under the government’s program are counseled on other alternatives to foreclosure, such as short sales where lenders agree to a home’s sale for less than the mortgage balance.

Bank of America reports that it modified about 232,000 mortgages last year. During the first four months of this year, it has completed about 157,000 modifications — all before the Obama housing rescue plan went into effect.

To settle claims brought by attorneys general in 11 states, Bank of America last year agreed to modify loans for homeowners holding riskier loans that often balloon into larger monthly payments later. The claims involved mortgages that originated with Countrywide Financial, which Bank of America took over in 2008.

Bank of America expects to begin processing applications from homeowners who are current with their mortgage within a few weeks.

Treasury Department officials say 16 mortgage servicers — the companies that collect homeowners’ monthly payments — have signed up to participate in the program. They say they are aware of servicer delays.

“Treasury continues to pursue strategies to help servicers reach more borrowers faster. Given the fragile state of housing markets, we will need to continue to do more to ensure loan modifications are occurring at scale under our program,” says Meg Reilly, a Treasury spokeswoman.

Lenders say they need to take time to review each application so that the modifications are meaningful. Some economists also warn that rushing approvals could result in modifications that only delay foreclosures rather than prevent them.

‘I don’t know who to trust’

Some applicants who were turned down say they don’t understand why.

Judy Lederman, 49, of Scarsdale, N.Y., a freelance writer after losing her full-time job in public relations a year ago, says she tried to get a modification with Chase about three months ago. She has an interest-only loan at 5.25% that resets in one year. How high it will rise depends on interest rates then.

She says Chase denied her request a few weeks ago because she has an adjustable-rate mortgage, but other borrowers with ARMs are getting modifications under the Obama plan.

“They kept me on hold and waiting for months. I bent over backwards to get them what they needed, but it was like no one was home,” Lederman says. “I really don’t know what else to do. I don’t know who to trust.”

The day after USA TODAY called Chase for comment, Lederman says the bank called her. She says the representative told her she was turned down because of missing information and that new forms to apply for a modification were being expedited to her home. “There was some miscommunication, but we have reconnected with the borrowers and are working on finding solutions for them,” Zuccarelli says regarding the complaints about Chase.

6 visitors online now
6 guests, 0 members
Max visitors today: 6 at 08:46 pm GMT+7
This month: 37 at 07-28-2010 12:06 am GMT+7
This year: 42 at 03-25-2010 12:53 pm GMT+7
All time: 42 at 03-25-2010 12:53 pm GMT+7