NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — A study released yesterday by RealtyTrac.com and Truila.com shows that more Americans than ever are interested in buying foreclosed properties.

What’s the best way to buy a property?

Buy from a bank and look for a REO, a real-estate owned property. These are homes that fail to sell at auctions and are then put back on the market by the banks that own them.

The bank clears any outstanding liens or loans against the house. And you’ll be able to inspect it firsthand, instead of just driving by.

Then, research your market. There a lots of places to get foreclosure listings. Two places you might want to consider are RealtyTrac.com and foreclosurepoint.com.


Contact realtors to get listings as well. These days, large numbers of realtors are specializing in the foreclosure market.

As you evaluate listings, make sure you don’t buy in a neighborhood that has an usually large number of foreclosed homes. It could keep prices constrained for a long time.

And check out the laws in your state. There are big differences in the process from state to sate. Some states, for example, require that foreclosures go through the court system, while others don’t.

Be aware that in some markets banks aren’t selling their foreclosed properties at fire sale prices. Set your initial offer 20% below market, more if your area has a lot of foreclosures.

Also, know that the Federal government is working to make the $8,000 tax credit for first time homebuyers available immediately to qualified buyers. This could help you close the gap if you don’t have enough for the down payment.

Some of the best markets to search for foreclosures:

* Southern Florida
* Las Vegas
* Seattle
* Colorado
* Southern California

Places where local economies will expand and immigration continues.

Got a financial dilemma? Go to cnnmoney.com/helpdesk to submit questions, read the Help Desk articles and check out new Help Desk videos. And tune in to CNN’s Newsroom Tuesdays and Fridays, when Gerri Willis and other experts answer your questions. To top of page

This weekend on the radio, there was an interesting conversation among a handful of financial and mortgage experts about the banking industry’s current fascination with loan modification programs. The participants in the discussion came up with some very good points about the modifications that lenders are currently offering to homeowners in foreclosure trying to lower their monthly bills and how banks use attorneys to pursue foreclosure but do not want to deal with a homeowner’s legal representation.

First of all, the mortgage companies are beginning to get into the loan modification game because of simple survival concerns. On a mortgage with a high interest rate, they may initiate negotiations with borrowers to lower the rate from, for example, 8% to 5%. Most borrowers who are behind in payments and facing a financial crisis may view this as an exceedingly good deal and not hesitate to take it.

However, the banks’ enthusiasm to begin modifying some mortgages is based only on short-term survival concerns. Lowering the rate by only a couple of percentage points is just not helping many homeowners. Within six months of a loan modification, property owners are falling behind again and may even end up right back in foreclosure.

This gives the banking industry all the ammunition it needs when it goes before the United States Congress, states it has been attempting to help homeowners, the modifications are just not working as borrowers fall behind again, and it would be great if the Congress could just give the banks a few billion dollars more to help them through the economic recession.

The lawyers in Congress, of course, acquiesce to the banks’ demands, hand them over several billion more dollars of money taken from taxpayers — the very people the banks are supposed to be modifying loans for — and send the lenders back to the foreclosure drawing board. The lenders, in turn, go right back to offering bad modifications and then sending their attorneys in once the homeowners redefault.

This is one more reason why banks love their own purchased lawyers but simply hate dealing with a lawyer who has the morals and ethics to help borrowers in financial distress. Some banks are now even recommending that borrowers do not get legal representation when attempting to work out an alternative to foreclosure.

Banks are pushing this line on homeowners for the same reason they originally supported subrpime, stated income, and no documentation loans — it works out for the banks over the long term but hurts borrowers. Originally, the foreclosure process used to have just a couple of steps:

1. Homeowners fall behind on payments.
2. Foreclosure process begins.

Now, bowing to political pressure, banks have added another step, although the destination is the same:

1. Homeowners fall behind on payments.
2. Banks offer inappropriate mortgage modification.
3. Homeowners fall behind on modification.
4. Foreclosure process begins.

By offering the poor loan modification solution to borrowers, banks can claim political cover later on when the plan fails. Homeowners are not aware of their rights during foreclosure, so therefore fall for the bank’s offer of a reduced interest rate, even though they know they will not be able to make the payments for the long term.

The lenders have always counted on the inability of borrowers to understand the complicated loan documents they sign to purchase their home. Banks themselves do not understand the documents, but they know that they can print enough money out of thin air to purchase lawyers and whole court systems that will interpret the loan paperwork in favor of the mortgage companies.

In conclusion, banks are beginning to offer loan modifications they know will later default for two primary reasons. First, it gives them political cover when they ask for more bailouts from Congress later on. And two, offering a modification preempts the homeowners’ search for a company or attorney who can help them negotiate a much better deal or determine what lending laws the bank has violated. But this preemption almost always ends up as a beneficial solution for banks and a horrible one for borrowers.

Nick publishes articles on the ForeclosureFish website, which aims to educate borrowers how they can prevent on their homes while they still have time. The site describes various methods to hold onto a house, including foreclosure refinancing, cash for keys, mortgage modification, filing bankruptcy, and more. Visit the site today to read more and find out what alternatives you can use to prevent the loss of your home: www.foreclosurefish.com/